One face photo becomes a before/after render, a 3D view and a morph video — the chairside presentation that turns "let me think about it" into a signed case.
Case acceptance stalls because patients cannot imagine the result. This closes that gap in under two minutes.
A guided full-face capture in the operatory or from the patient’s own phone, behind an explicit AI-processing consent.
About a minute later you have a before and after pair, a 3D view and a short morph video, ready to show.
Walk the patient through it in presentation mode, then log the outcome so case acceptance becomes a number you can actually manage.
Everything you would expect from a smile simulator — attached to the patient record instead of a vendor portal.
A framing guide gets a usable full-face photo on the first try, in the operatory or on the patient’s own phone.
A side-by-side the patient can hold, share with a spouse, and come back to.
The same source photo drives a rotatable view and a short morph — the formats that actually move a decision.
Full-screen, no chrome, no pricing until you choose to show it.
If a simulation provider’s quality or terms slip, we switch the engine behind the scenes. Your workflow, your renders and every case you have already presented stay exactly where they are.
Accepted, deferred or declined is recorded on the record — so acceptance rate stops being a guess.
On its own it is a nice picture. Attached to the record it becomes an estimate, a booking and a number in the scorecard.
Simulation is a marketing-adjacent use of a clinical-grade identifier, so the consent bar is higher, not lower.
Permission to use a photo is not permission to run it through an AI. Studio asks separately, in writing, before anything is generated.
A simulation shows a possible aesthetic result, never a clinical prediction — and it is labelled that way everywhere the patient sees it.
The company that runs the render never keeps the photo. We log that it happened; they keep nothing.
If a patient revokes consent, the photo is purged everywhere in Enamel that holds it — not just in this one product.
You already know what the result will look like. The patient does not — and "let me think about it" is usually what that sounds like.
One photo on the operatory iPad, and a before and after they can actually see. The conversation stops being abstract and starts being a decision.
The render goes to their phone. The conversation that actually decides a $9,000 case happens at their kitchen table — and now there is something to look at.
Every presentation is logged as accepted, deferred or declined, so you can see which doctor and which case type is actually converting.
See a simulation run end to end on your own workflow, from consent to recorded outcome.
Smile simulations illustrate a possible aesthetic outcome. They are not a diagnosis, a treatment plan, or a guarantee of clinical result.